To see a full-size view of the images posted, just click on them.

RULES FOR POSTING COMMENTS: This blog is meant to be interactive. Please utilize the comment feature to respond to posts that prompt a reaction. You do not have to agree with me to post, but I do ask that your comment pertain to the post itself. I also ask that "anonymous" guests attach some sort of name to their comments so readers can tell everyone apart. (If you cannot follow these simple rules, your post may be DELETED or at the very least mocked for the entertainment of those who can respect my guidelines.)

Thursday, November 7, 2019

Duck philosophy

The problem with probalism (not to be confused with the Trouble with Tribbles):


So..............


....if this poor bastard starts to waddle and 'quack',
 he could end up as a probalistic person's dinner!


10 comments:

  1. Apples and oranges! The fact that someone might mistakenly eat the second guy doesn't make it rational to look at the first guy and say, "What duck? I don't see a duck. Why do you see a duck? Are you sure you haven't been conditioned to see a duck?" LOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, I'm glad you realized that this post was meant as a joke and not a serious dissertation on probablism. (I actually like a lot of the pragmatic aspects of probablism.....but the fun is in pointing out the exceptions.)

      Delete
  2. yummy duck confit so good but so bad for you

    ReplyDelete
  3. the beauty of open discourse we agree we disagree everyone lives on
    we want kink and only kink they likely skipped the last post and dont get the hilarious nature of this one


    i hope its not driving you quackers

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you mean Dan, I think he certainly made the connection but I can’t speak for others.

      And yeah, the whole reason I started this blog was for discussion so I don’t mind people disagreeing. It’s all good.

      Delete
  4. Ah! But does the second one SMELL like a duck? Yes, ducks have a distinct odor! Also "real" ducks don't wear clothing to my knowledge.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The little quote doesn't include smell or clothing, so the probablists will have to add those qualifiers before I grinningly concede that point. LOL

      Delete
    2. I have an amazing (according to Shilo) sense of smell, so I nearly always add those qualifiers. Well that, and I'm always careful about the allergy thing.

      Delete
    3. howard the duck wore clothes....if you pardon the exceedingly b movie reference

      Delete